CRITERIA FOR GRADING

<

Oswaldo Cruz Award and Monographs Award

First phase (30% of final grade)

Scientific accuracy: criteria corresponding to 15% of the grade;

Academic contribution: criteria corresponding to 15% of the grade;

Practical application: criteria corresponding to 10% of the grade;

Importance to scientific knowledge: criteria corresponding to 20% of the grade;

Abstract clarity: criteria corresponding to 10% of the grade;

Introduction and discussion: criteria corresponding to 10% of the grade;

Bibliographical references: criteria corresponding to 10% of the grade;

Appropriate layout for publication: criteria corresponding to 10% of the grade.

Second phase (70% of final grade)

Language: criteria corresponding to 10% of the grade;

Layout: criteria corresponding to 10% of the grade;

Presenter’s posture: criteria corresponding to 10% of the grade;

Content: criteria corresponding to 20% of the grade;

Knowledge of the topic presented: criteria corresponding to 30% of the grade;

Author’s participation and portrayal: criteria corresponding to 20% of the grade.

Panels Award

First phase (30% of final grade)

Scientific accuracy: criteria corresponding to 15% of the grade;

Academic contribution: criteria corresponding to 15% of the grade;

Practical application: criteria corresponding to 10% of the grade;

Abstract clarity: criteria corresponding to 15% of the grade;

Introduction and discussion: criteria corresponding to 15% of the grade;

Objectives: criteria corresponding to 10% of the grade;

Relevance: criteria corresponding to 20% of the grade.

Second phase (70% of final grade)

Topic’s importance: criteria corresponding to 20% of the grade;

Research elaboration quality: criteria corresponding to 15% of the grade;

Visual presentation quality: criteria corresponding to 15% of the grade;

Oral presentation quality: criteria corresponding to 15% of the grade;

Coherence between the abstract, the panel and the oral presentation: criteria corresponding to 15% of the grade;

Knowledge of the topic presented: criteria corresponding to 20% of the grade.

Fundação Faculdade de Medicina Award

Written Researches

Scientific accuracy: criteria corresponding to 4,5% of the final grade;

Academic contribution: criteria corresponding to 4,5% of the final grade;

Practical application: criteria corresponding to 3% of the final grade;

Importance to scientific knowledge: criteria corresponding to 6% of the final grade;

Abstract clarity: criteria corresponding to 3% of the final grade;

Introduction and discussion: criteria corresponding to 3% of the final grade;

Bibliographical references: criteria corresponding to 3% of the final grade;

Appropriate layout for publication: criteria corresponding to 3% of the final grade.

Oral Presentations

Language: criteria corresponding to 7% of the final grade;

Layout: criteria corresponding to 7% of the final grade;

Presenter’s posture: criteria corresponding to 7% of the final grade;

Content: criteria corresponding to 14% of the final grade;

Knowledge of the topic presented: criteria corresponding to 21% of the final grade;

Author’s participation and portrayal: criteria corresponding to 14% of the final grade.

Partners

Contact

+55 11 3061-7410

Av. Dr. Arnaldo, 455
Subsolo - Cerqueira César
São Paulo, SP, Brasil

RECEIVE OUR NEWSLETTERS